We all grow up learning a specific set of morals from either
our own families and those from peers throughout our lives. Law enforcement
officials are expected to be more ethical than an average everyday person. We
have been discussing in class the roles ethics play in society and how to
distinguish right from wrong. Like many jobs, police officers are tempted every
day with making easy money, letting people of authority off and accepting gifts
from the public. We as a society hear from time to time about criminal justice
officials getting involved in acts that are morally wrong. Not filing evidence,
planting evidence and distributing drugs and alcohol.
Bigger Police departments have undercover narcotics units.
In this video below is how we expect all officer to act in these situations
with drugs in communities. It is the way that Kant would expect any official to
act in drug bust situations. Something stressed religiously throughout Kant's
views of ethics, is that everyone no matter who they are should be treated
equally. Kant believes that happiness is irrelevant. The law is the Law no
matter what. This youtube video below displays a deterrence method within the
criminal justice field. We talked also about Utilitarianism, which happens to
be the logical way of thinking and rationalizing.
We hear all the time that there were busts on police
departments narcotics units. "A drug addict performed sex acts on New York
Police Department officers in return for crack cocaine," according to A
Daily Mail reporter. In this specific case a police officer was asking for
sexual favors from an addict and distributed drugs after the fact. In the article
below shows and proves that this specific officer was only thinking about his
happiness and not looking out for the greater good. Not only what he was doing
was unethical, he was promoting more drugs onto the streets. When people act
out in these ways they don’t stop to think that they are preventing other
officers perform their duties. This officer’s virtue was way off because he
presented himself in a way that makes all of police officers look like they
don’t know the difference between wrong and right. More of the article dealt
with the fact that police officers have a “blue code of silence.“ A term that
is very important to people on the force, because they are supposed to have
each other’s backs and not snitch on one another. “Melanie Perez, testifying at
the trial of Jason Arbeeny, told Brooklyn Supreme Court that another officer
called her to his home, made her smoke drugs and then demanded sex.” (Daily
Reporter) This here makes myself and other reader believe that there was more
than one officer involved and no one had moral values to step up.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2052810/New-York-narcotics-officers-Melanie-Perez-trial-corruption.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2052810/New-York-narcotics-officers-Melanie-Perez-trial-corruption.html
In the end we hope that police
officer can use their discretionary decisions themselves and can find a balance
between ignoring the law and applying the law too rigorously. The value of
ethics helps increase the sensitivity to what is right and what is wrong. We all
like to think we act out for the greater good, but we all have an ounce of
selfishness within us. Laws are there for us to follow the rules and if it
applies to one person then it applies to all people, no matter the race, gender
and age.
Victoria Sims
References:
Daily Mail Reporter, “NYPD narcotics officers 'gave crack
addict drugs in return for sex.” Mail Online. Web. Feb 1 2012
You made a good point that I really liked earlier in the article about how police officers are supposed to be held to a higher moral standard than the average person. This is so true and very important. Like you said, my morals were instilled into me long ago by my parents. They taught me how to live a good life and be an all around good person. I've always held myself to a higher moral standard, and that is one reason why I want to become a police officer.
ReplyDelete