New ways to combat street crime and kidnappings over
conventional beliefs.
Muggings and street crime are still commonplace in large
cities. The general consensus and how people are taught to deal with street
crime is to give away their possessions since the value of their life or bodily
harm is much higher overall. I believe the strategy should be different
however. Depending on size and gender this may be an issue but I think muggers
would be forced to think twice if they faced a victim that fought back.
Deterring street crime may have a situational connotation to it but if the
perpetrator was viciously beaten every time they attempted to steal the power
and fear would shift towards the victim. I don’t want people to get the wrong
impression and that the public should take the law into their own hands. I am
actually thinking that from an early age people should be taught to protect themselves.
This does bring up issues. Muggers usually target elderly, smaller, or female
victims. I think that people can have the advantage however. Pepper spray, tazers,
and conceal carry would deter criminals. Technology has changed the way that
society can protect them and in the same way it may be time to rethink how we
think about fighting back. The following article shows that people who can
defend themselves should. Justin, the man in the article handed over his money
to his mugger, but the mugger still attacked him. The mugger’s weapon failed
and Justin took him down using former training that he wouldn’t elaborate about.
The main issue is for people to recognize the fight and
flight response. This stretches to kids fighting off their kidnappers
Original thinking for Kids to avoid kidnapping is to run,
hit, and scream. This instruction is very important, but it is not enough. Kids
are now being taught a backup plan to ensure that they are not moved to a
second location.
The grip, dip, and spin are a newer way to teach kids to be persistent
in fighting off their kidnappers. The video explains that the kidnappers are
interested in a quick extraction with the child causing little harm. This psychological
boosts gives the children power to fight back when nothing else work. The kidnapper
will most likely give up after a struggle with the child due to unnecessary
attention and more resistance than anticipated.
I completely agree. Educating the public, not only against mugging, but for self-defense in general would create a much more aware public. Not only would criminals think twice about mugging, but about many other crimes because the public would know what to do in certain situations to be able to stop a potential criminal from committing crimes.
ReplyDeleteI think this is great! More people should invest time into learning ways to defend and protect themselves. The public should be advocates of their own safety.
ReplyDelete